.

Fifty Shades Of Feminism Or The Stink Of Regret

I finished all three Shades books a few weeks ago.

My experience with these novels has been stimulating, perplexing and infuriating.

I can’t remember where I first heard about the books but I do know that I was one of the first among my friends to open that naughty cover and plunge into the world E.L. James created. I was immediately swept up in Anastasia’s story and hated myself in the morning for that. The feminist in me was appalled but the sex goddess in me was, well, totally turned on.

You see I am a pornography virgin, or at least I was three books ago! Its not that I am a prude— its that I never felt the urge to flick on the late night pay per view. But as I read  Fifty Shades I began to wonder if I had missed something.

I had a conversation with a friend  who was also caught in the haze of Fifty Shades about the silver balls. If you haven’t read the book, I am not going to explain these to you but if you have you know exactly of which shiny objects I am speaking.   My friend acted like I must have been living under a rock to not know about these little orbs of pleasure.

Yet, besides the cheap thrills I couldn’t understand why I was intrigued by a story about a young woman, my own daughters age, entering into a relationship where she was not only dominated but tortured.

While I read I had to block out Jiminy Cricket telling me that I was a traitor to my almost completed degree in Gender Studies. I took a cold shower and tried to evaluate the phenomena from an academic point of view.

Katie Roiphe offers a theory for the popularity of the novels. She claims that the novels are a reflection an inner conflict many women feel with their growing dominance in all spheres of life.  While women may be on top in the boardroom, Roiphe posits, we also have a visceral, irresistible, enduring desire to be dominated by a man in the bedroom.  Which explains the heretofore unknown rise in popularity of the Dominant/Submissive relationship.  In other words, women aren’t really comfortable being dominant and will take a ritualized performance of submission as a salve for this discomfort.

Not a very feminist point of view and I am not convinced.  I imagine if I were to do a proper analysis this theory would prove hard to prove. Frankly it feels as offensive as the books.

So it was a few weeks ago that I heard Gloria Steinem  speak about her new documentary on HBO. I highly recommend this film as it chronicles the struggles women endured and continue to endure in our quest for equality and respect. As I sat in the audience I

realized what I had inherited from this brilliant, brave and beautiful activist. I inherited a responsibility to protect the progress women have achieved in business and politics as well as in their personal lives  in any way I can , any where the opportunity presents.

I worry that books like Fifty Shades diminish women’s attention to this responsibility with the promise of male rescue and awesome, mind blowing sex. ( even if the only way to get that is with handcuffs and spanking, as if we have done something wrong.)

These novels then are not merely harmless pornography but are yet another way to chip away the idea that a woman can fully participate in a life outside the home and also be a good wife, mother and lover.

Not long ago I would have thought these debates settled but all one has to do is gaze upon the laws being passed in State Legislatures across the country that curtail access to birth control and abortion to see this is not so.  Let’s not forget what really liberated women-The Pill.

How is it then that I still read all three novels?  It is hard to understand what propelled me beyond the first. I mean E.L. James is not Tolstoy and the descriptions of what they were doing was redundant and, c’mon, not physically possible. So , Yawn to the nipple clips  and ho hum to the silver balls because by the end of the trilogy she had managed to make even those things seem routine. And what of Anastasia? What was her reward for agreeing to play by Grey’s rules? She became a docile rescuer of a damaged soul dedicated to him and his needs.  A truly regressive role model.

The fact is I had wandered off an important path while reading and stunk with regret.

I resolve then, to support women who are running for office, give to Planned Parenthood and embrace the fifty shades of feminism in all its complexity.

Posted in books & entertainment, Our Blog Circle, Tick Talker.

Related posts:

  1. Fifty Shades of Grey
  2. Fifty Shades of Bondage
  3. Fifty Shades of Grey – downloaded it yet? (VN Newsletter, April 5, 2012)
  4. What is the Fascination with Fifty Shades of Grey?
  5. WHY FIFTY IS THE NEW FIFTY” & THAT’S GOOD NEWS

add your responses

3 Responses

  1. She Cat She Cat says

    I LOVED, LOVED the trilogy Fifty Shades Of Grey. No regret for reading them for me.

    The sex scenes….. Well, what two people consent to, and do within their own home is their business. Yes, they became repetitive, and I skimmed through most of them after the first book, but they were hot and wild.

    I disagree with your statement, that Anna became a ” Truly regressive role model.”. I think the story was about love, compassion, trust, and communication. If anything, she empowered herself, became compassionate, and understanding and learned how to love unconditionally.

    In my opinion, the books were great, so great, that I am reading them for the second time. A truly great read, in my opinion…..

    0 like

  2. Generic Image Contessa says

    I have not read the book (Fifty Shades of Grey) yet, but I’ve heard lots about it!

    My feeling is that women can be feminists and still have a wonderful sex life where she and her husband/Guy can decide what they want to do within their bedroom and not have it conflict in any way with who she is outside or within her work world.

    It is very important that we seperate the two.  I hope that those who consider themselves as feminists can enjoy their sex lives without always having to be dominate!…..And by dominate, I do not in anyway mean that someone is doing something to you that YOU DO NOT WANT to happen to you or to have  done to you.  I merely mean that your man can be the initiator and the leader sometimes!!

    Where I draw the line in any relationship, whether you define yourself as a feminist or not; is to be sexually abused and have it be perceived as dominance!!

    There should ALWAYS be an agreement with whatever is done.  Also,  faith and trust in your partner is of the utmost importance, that he will strictly abide by whatever has been agreed upon.  When or if that agreement is violated, that is a deal breaker!!

    I’m just sayin!! 

    0 like

  3. Guilded Lilly Guilded Lilly says

    Disclaimer: My decades long background in women’s erotica writing taints my opinion of Fifty Shades. So knowing this, here is just one woman’s take on the books.–

    Firstly, I am thrilled that a self-published female author has found such amazing success from a background of fan fiction. Bravo for breaking that particular glass ceiling. For years I had a website dedicated to encouraging women to write more sophisticated stories of graphic sexuality…guilt free. Fan fic was an EXCELLENT starting point. To have a singular, un-agented author make it to the top is absolutely wonderful. And long overdue.

    However, and secondly, having read several excerpts from Fifty Shades, I was disappointed in the quality of the writing and the faux- reality level of the relationship in a BDSM lifestyle specifically but also the whole general theme. What I read was basically a Romance novel bodice ripper on kink-laced speed, with the virginal young woman and the always oh so handsome older hero showing her *the way* to a certain sexuality on his terms. Bottom line, it’s rather shallow and not at all equal to the complexities of a genuine BDSM relationship.
    But, the struggle is that I don’t want to discourage any forward step of women’s sexual growth in literature. I would certainly hope this might be a trigger towards masses of women readers embracing a deeper and more intense sexuality from their female literary heroines, but as far as what I read, this isn’t the measuring stick to use for women to take that literary sexual/strong/mature leap.
    Beyond the surface titillating *read of the moment*, if you even want to look beyond that, (and it is perfectly OK if that is how you look at it) I feel this novel is doing a disservice to a woman’s core sexuality.

    2 like

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting